Male
Joined on 12/18/10
Posted by Insanctuary - April 11th, 2014
The Subatomic God
Posted by Insanctuary - March 26th, 2014
Astaindie Underpanticas! *poof* A correlation has appeared before us! What mystery ought to surface this time around, you ask? It's the mystery of the human eye, the human genitalia, the human heart, the human life and the forces of nature! As experiential creatures, we not only experience the forces of natural creation, but also the forces of natural disaster. See that volcano over there? That's what makes our climactic genitals so climactic! Observe the bellowing power of nature's snout, like the nose of an ox, spewing out such magnificent energy! Observe how the loins rock and quake as they increase in tension, like the shifting tectonic plates found below earth's crust! The human body is creating life out of the dangerous forces of nature, explaining why sex always becomes rougher near the peak of the climax.
The human genitalia has a secret power -- it can take the form of a starfish (the ass), the heart (behind the tip of the penis), the brain (the scrotum) and the brain's stem (the penis). Our genitalia are symbolic masses of flesh and appearance which represent the basics of life. Wait, there's more! Observe my avatar to the left; the one with the naked man. You have to look at the man's ass and the back of the man's shoulders to make out a "torso", that "torso" that you see is really the making of a turtle's body! Wait, there's more! If you understand the dualistic nature of reality, you'll also have the ability to make out the dualistic formation between the genitalia and the human head (the penis/scrotum; the brain/stem)! Be amazed! The human body has more than one dimension, depending on how you look at it. The human head is the "penis" of the "torso" I mentioned, while the human penis is the "head" of the actual "torso" that we all generally see already. This dualistic feature is much like how an animal has genitalia and a tail.
The human eye secretes liquid upon tension and release, just like the human genitalia. The human pupil does not have a slit, while the opening of the eye does have a slit, which controls tears. Cats and snakes have slits in their eyes to control the light that is drawn in, due to sensitivity to light. Our genitalia have slits to control our urine, waste or semen. The human language is based on the Universe, which is where all of our "experiences", "ideas" and "functionalities" come from. This means that while naming things we observe, we're "inspired" by the "like"ness of that object compared to another object, i.e a sunflower looks like the sun -- this allows us to subconsciously make more sense out of the world then we consciously are aware of. We call the penis the snake, while the slit is found in the snake eye; we call the pussy a pussy (cat), while the slit is found in the cat eye! There is a relationship found in the snake, cat, eye, slit and genitalia via function.
The human heart has 4 stages in chamber developement: fish > frog > turtle > human. The human body consists of a turtle's body in metaphoric form!
Thus we can conclude there is a bigger picture to even our genitalia, and that all life originated from the ocean. This will be for Day 2, however. For now, this will be left to ponder.
Discuss.
Posted by Insanctuary - March 16th, 2014
The theory, in summary, is representing the possibility that the inferential components behind the terms: consciousness/water; ego/gravity, are proving to be of significant distinction upon acknowledging the correlation they all share -- as one.
A much more coherent and tangible example of my theory is here:
Human body equals planet body. Both bodies contain an electromagnetic source surrounding its shell; both bodies contain mineral, water and, as I argue it, the ego, which is the eye of gravity; the "eye" that pulls in matter in its more recognizable form. Water conducts electricity. Gravity affects water. Water currents, electrical currents, air currents all travel the same way. Air is affected by gravity. Everything we observe is not the thing, in itself, but a metaphor which represents the forces that created the object/subject. Therefore gravity is NOT just physical, it comes in a metaphysical form, such as consciousness. We are disillusioned too much to understand why this makes sense, because we are still looking at ourselves as an individual unique vessel, rather than ANOTHER metaphor that is as much of a part of the Universe as any other metaphor! We are as much as a planet, as those planets in the solar system. We are tiny systems of the main system, and the Universe extracts these tiny systems which represents itself under a thousand metaphoric masks; we aren't gaining knowledge/information -- we are CONSUMING knowledge/information. We think what we are doing is "casually taking in information", but we, being like planets, and borne into this world through the parts of a star, are also consuming everything around us exactly like galaxies! We are literally role-playing planets, stars and galaxies on a much smaller scale, and this theory is going to prove it -- I am determined and confident. I'm not the fool here -- the fool is one that separates themselves from what manifested their existence, the planet's existence, the star's existence and every other individual force that exists in itself, or in apparent form! This world is NOT intrinsically physical -- this world is TRANSCENDENTALLY physical. We are NOT intrinsically metaphysical -- we are TRANSCENDENTALLY metaphysical! We are APPARENT existence, within an existing Universe! We are the reflection in the mirror in the eyes of the Universe...
"The Universe is still young and metaphorically distinguishing itself. It wears a thousand masks -- it may wear a thousand more. There's no telling the direction of the Universe because there isn't one."
"The Universe is "everything" as it is, and "nothing" as it seems." How else could "one" picture say a "thousand" words? Unless...
Posted by Insanctuary - March 11th, 2014
Does that entail that this world is naturally duplicitous? "Duplicity" is a man-made construct, however being stranded in the middle of a desert helps demonstrate how we do not survive only by what is tangible and physical, but also by what is intangible and metaphysical (duplicitous, by nature). That alone determines we are both physical and metaphysical, much like the world, itself. What is strange, though, is that the universe started metaphysical and then slowly turned physical; we, on the other hand, started physical, and then slowly turned metaphysical. What's more interesting, is that people have a choice to turn metaphysical, or remain physical. Like us being physical, and our reflection in the mirror being metaphysical; it appears that we come from the opposite side of the spectrum. Why is this? Unless... there is truth to which the entire universe is perpetually reincarnating not through life/death, but through physical/metaphysical form. If this can be axiomatically demonstrated, it could then prove that life is naturally duplicitous. It's all based on make-believe and acting, in life, no? It's all based on metaphors and reactions, in sub-life, yes?
Posted by Insanctuary - March 4th, 2014
I never did seem to understand why so many people believe that winning an argument is based on arguing the distension rather than the discussion. If your feelings are imploding based on the context and interactivity of the discussion, then it's blatant enough to understand who is stagnating and who is sensible... If your feelings are hurt, or your body is convulging from the obscene level of force, then this doesn't mean that what caused it is a falsification -- in fact, it's quite the opposite. Thinking being offended equates to being the victim is very counter-intuitive. Anyone that spends more time arguing their lack of position in an argument is clearly losing upon their engagement. Nobody -- nobody -- that actually understands the heart of the discussion will ever argue about the difficulty between one and the other, as to imply that its hopeless between them and the other; they would address it formally and intellectually. The whole "you hurt my feelings", is essentially "truth hurts" -- if it wasn't "true", in the slightest degree, it would have NO EFFECT, however it does because there's a correlation between what hurts you, and yourself. Therefore, arguing is not about "rationalizing" -- it's about "reasoning" -- something only few people in this world have gained the intellectual privilege to take responsibility in. The rest are simply children, or children in "matured bodies" that want to believe they have things figured out; the moment they based their argument upon absence rather than presence, is the moment their misconstructivity defines them more than constructivity. If you have gone so far beyond the "balance" state of being, and it comes to the point that everything that isn't you, defines you, it's verily certain that you're a black hole that should have no influence or inspiration on anybody, if you can't even influence or inspire yourself, hence why you're always arguing people to reassure yourself and fill in your holes again, just like sex and greed.